One of the lead researchers of the study, Professor Frédéric Amant,
said the following about the findings: “Our results show that fear of
cancer treatment is no reason to terminate a pregnancy, that maternal
treatment should not be delayed and that chemotherapy can be given. The
study also shows that children suffer more from prematurity than from
chemotherapy, so avoiding prematurity is more important than avoiding
chemotherapy.” Amant’s team examined 129 children born after their mothers underwent
cancer treatment while their children were still in utero. Remarkably,
radiotherapy, chemotherapy nor surgery harmed the unborn babies. This
information led the researchers to believe that women who are pregnant
and have cancer should not delay treatment and do not “need” to abort
their baby.
This site is for information on the various Chemo treatments and Stem Cell Therapies since 1992. This journey became bitter sweet in 2014, with the passing of my beautiful and dear wife. Sherry, had fought Non - Hodgkins Lymphoma(NHL) since 1990, in and out of remissions time and time again. From T-Cell therapies(1990's) to Dual Cord Blood Transplant(2014), she was in Clinical Trials over the years. This site is for informational purpose only and is not to promote the use of certain therapies.
Thursday, October 1, 2015
Cancer Treatment doesn’t harm unborn baby
A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine shows that cancer treatments do not harm unborn children. “Prenatal exposure to maternal cancer with or without treatment did not
impair the cognitive, cardiac, or general development of children in
early childhood. Prematurity was correlated with a worse cognitive
outcome, but this effect was independent of cancer treatment.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment