Chemotherapy and radiation failed to thwart Erika Hurwitz’s rare cancer of white blood cells. So her doctors offered her another option, a drug for melanoma. The result was astonishing.
Within four weeks, a red rash covering her body, so painful she had required a narcotic patch and the painkiller OxyContin, had vanished. Her cancer was undetectable.“It has been a miracle drug,” said Mrs. Hurwitz, 78, of Westchester County. She
is part of a new national effort to try to treat cancer based not on
what organ it started in, but on what mutations drive its growth.
Cancers
often tend to be fueled by changes in genes, or mutations, that make
cells grow and spread to other parts of the body. There are now an
increasing number of drugs that block mutations in cancer genes and can
halt a tumor’s growth.
While
such an approach has worked in a few isolated cases, those cases cannot
reveal whether other patients with the same mutation would have a
similar experience.
Researchers and drug companies asked the Food and Drug Administration for its opinion, realizing that if the F.D.A. did not accept the studies, no drugs would ever be approved on the basis of them. But the F.D.A. said it sanctioned them and could approve drugs with basket study data alone.
These are the sorts of studies many seriously ill patients have been
craving, a guarantee that if they enter a study they will get a
promising new drug.The studies move fast; it does not take years to
see a big effect if there is one at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment